Funders Want Outcomes, Not Output

Funders, establishments, government offices and even benefactors, need the associations they store to exhibit results, not report exercises and yields. They need to reserve comes about arranged projects, not read touching stories.

Funders need to see:

System more than strategies – Improve graduation rate through coaching VS X number of members in an after school program

Huge picture versus counts of exercises – Produce X number of individuals in occupations that compensation $15 or more every hour utilized for 1 year or more VS Train X number individuals in assembling abilities and Assist X number of individuals in resume planning

Joining forces more than alluding – Partner with X number of associations to give GED qualified members to a workforce advancement program VS Refer customers who can’t read to education associations. Accomplice infers association – Refer suggests you are finished

Adequacy rather than hard work – X number of program members plan to pick a vocation in medicinal services VS Spoke to 25 understudy bunches on social insurance professions and taken an interest in 3 secondary school vocation day occasions

Systemic change versus appalling stories – Facilitated the selection of new approach by the Sheriff’s Department that guides officers to contact Solicitor’s office before confining adolescents VS Story about a School Resource Officer that directed two eleventh graders and shielded them from dropping out

Proof of development and finish – Provided assets that empowered X number of program graduates to remain utilized in years two through five VS Contacted X number of program graduates to finish review about work status

Profundity, broadness and duty of associations with partners – Coalition of a secondary school, a group focus, guardians, Boy Scouts and two houses of worship give mentoring and support to at-hazard 6th graders. Nitty gritty MOUs exist between the associations; guardians and understudy members sign responsibility letters. Evaluations and test scores of understudy members are checked. The result objective of the program is that advancement from 6th to seventh grade will enhance every year. Versus A people group focus that offers an after school program for center schoolers with volunteer mentors and screens. There are no MOUs with different associations or schools. Cooperation by understudies is intentional; guardians are not required to be included. Since there is no formal association with the school the group focus can’t get evaluations or test scores.

Clearly it requires investment to concentrate on results and create program, estimations and connections that will finish those results. Yet, the time is an interest in a proposition and a program that will get supported.

Comments are closed.